![]() ![]() ♥ Fourth, if the circuit court made any errors with respect to the The jury during the guilt phase of the trial? Officer and (2) a video of the battery, both of which had been presented to ![]() "blacked out" for a few seconds when he punched a corrections Indicated that he would not produce any evidence of his mental disease orĭefect in the responsibility phase except: (1) his own testimony that he Plea before the responsibility phase of the trial, after the defendant ♤ Third, did the circuit court err in dismissing the defendant's NGI Phase of a bifurcated criminal trial in which the issue was whether theĭefendant was not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect? ![]() Was not competent to testify as to his mental condition in the responsibility ♣ Second, did the circuit court err when it ruled that the defendant Whether the defendant was not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect? Responsibility phase of a bifurcated criminal trial in which the issue was Requiring the defendant to produce expert testimony to carry his burden in the ♢ First, did the circuit court apply the wrong substantive law by The issues presented may be stated as follows. We review here an unpublished decision of theĪffirming the defendant's conviction. Plea before commencement of the second phase in which the jury was to determine The Grant County Circuit Court, George S. Under circumstances that will be explained, The defendant met his burden on his NGI plea in the second phase. The jury was expected to determine whether The defendant, Erick Magett (Magett), wasįound guilty of a felony in the first phase of the trial. On the second phase of a bifurcated criminal trial in which the defendantĮntered a plea of not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect (NGI). REVIEW of a decision of the Court of Appeals. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |